
Dock and Yard Management Software – The Top 5 For 2025
Looking for the best yard management software and dock scheduling software?
You’re in the right place.
In this review, we’ll compare the top 5 dock and yard management platforms—covering real-time yard visibility, dock door scheduling, appointment/slot booking, trailer tracking, gate & carrier check-in, and WMS/TMS integrations.

Still managing your docks and yards the old-fashioned way?
A lot of teams still wrangle clipboards, spreadsheets, radios, and “who’s got that trailer?” group texts to run the yard and docks.
It works—until it doesn’t.
Yard management software is a real game changer: it gives you real-time yard visibility, automated dock door scheduling and slot booking, faster gate check-in/check-out, and clear trailer tracking so you’re not hunting for equipment.
You’ll cut dwell time and detention fees, balance workloads, boost door utilization, and keep carriers moving.
It also centralizes communication, timestamps every move for audit/compliance, and surfaces KPIs like turn times and on-time performance—all while integrating with your WMS/TMS.
Net result: more throughput without adding doors or headcount, fewer bottlenecks, and a smoother experience for your team and your partners.
Why dock & yard software matters (data):
- A 15-minute increase in average dwell time increases the expected crash rate by 6.2%.
- Detention reduces truckload drivers’ annual earnings by $1.1–$1.3B and carriers’ net income by $250.6–$302.9M.
How we’ll do the reviews:
Before we dive into the reviews, here’s how we’re sizing things up: core features (dock door scheduling, yard visibility, trailer/truck tracking, gate & carrier check-in), integrations with WMS/TMS/ERP, ease of setup and day-to-day use, analytics/KPIs (dwell time, door utilization, on-time performance), automation and mobile tools, pricing transparency, and quality of support.
Every operation runs a little differently, so we’ll flag who each platform fits best (3PLs, manufacturers, high-throughput DCs) and call out any trade-offs.
The goal: help you match the right yard management system to your workflows—not the other way around.
GoRamp — Yard & Dock Management

GoRamp combines dock appointment scheduling with a true YMS: a real-time “Eagle View” yard map, self-service carrier booking, gate management (incl. license-plate scan + mobile check-in), yard checks, workflow automation, and dashboards that track detention, asset time, and team performance.
It also plugs into your WMS/TMS/ERP to keep data flowing across systems.
Pros
- Real-time yard visibility and interactive map; carrier self-booking and configurable slot/schedule rules.
- Gate & shuttle management plus alerting/automation; actionable KPI dashboards.
- Quick setup claims for dock scheduling; supports external carrier booking links.
- Published entry pricing (starts around $249/mo) with a free trial, per G2 listing. G2
Cons
- Reviewers note limited customization/missing features and slot-time flexibility could be better.
- Some advanced capabilities may require add-on bundles, per third-party reviews.
Best for:
SMB to mid-market warehouses/3PLs moving off spreadsheets and email to appointment-based dock scheduling with a lightweight, integrated YMS; several reviewers call it a strong fit for operations that aren’t overly complex.
FourKites (Dynamic Yard)

FourKites’ Dynamic Yard pairs in-yard visibility with in-transit ETAs so dock teams can reprioritize work, cut dwell, and keep calendars accurate.
Add-ons like AutoBooker and Inbound Scheduler AI automate slotting and labor, and there’s optional computer-vision for gate automation.
Pros
- Real-time ETAs + yard view to reprioritize doors, reduce detention.
- Automated scheduling (AutoBooker, Inbound Scheduler AI) with claims of up to 60% labor reduction and 5–10% OTD improvement.
- Proven impact: case studies show detention fee cuts (e.g., 52% for Kimberly-Clark).
- Gate automation/vision options for hands-off check-in/out.
Cons
- Enterprise, sales-led pricing; no public list price.
- Best with integrations (TMS/WMS)—more value, but more implementation lift. (Inference based on FourKites’ integration posture.)
- It may be overkill for single-site/basic yards (subjective fit).
Best for
Multi-site shippers and 3PLs with high trailer turns who want predictive ETAs tied to dock calendars, measurable detention/dwell reduction, and are comfortable with enterprise implementations and pricing.
OpenDock

OpenDock is a cloud-based dock-appointment platform that lets carriers self-book, gives warehouses a centralized calendar, and offers options like driver check-in and basic yard/dock workflows. It’s focused on eliminating phone/email back-and-forth and tightening slot utilization.
Pros
- Carrier self-scheduling reduces calls/emails and helps cut detention/labor time.
- Fast to adopt/easy to use, with strong user ratings and “ease of use” recognition.
- Scorecards & in/out tracking to monitor carrier performance.
- TMS/WMS integrations (e.g., Redwood, Qued) for two-way appointment creation and notifications.
Cons
- Per-facility pricing; entry tier listed on third-party sites rather than clearly on the homepage.
- Carrier adoption can vary, so some partners may need nudging to use the portal.
- Primarily a scheduling tool; advanced yard automation may require integrations or other systems.
Best for
Warehouses and 3PLs that run many appointments across one or multiple sites and want a straightforward, carrier-led scheduling system with basic yard/dock workflows and optional integrations—without the overhead of a heavy enterprise YMS.
Kaleris (formerly PINC)

Kaleris delivers an enterprise-grade YMS that blends real-time trailer/asset location (RTLS via RFID/GPS) with dock, gate, and move orchestration—plus new appointment scheduling and prebuilt WMS/TMS integrations.
As part of a broader execution suite (incl. Navis and ShipXpress), it can connect yard ops with transportation and terminal workflows.
Pros
- Deep visibility & automation: RTLS asset location, “whiteboard” move sequencing, and appointment scheduling to reduce bottlenecks and dwell.
- Proven outcomes & fast time-to-value: Published case studies and third-party notes cite quick deployments and ROI windows.
- Strong integrations: Prebuilt connectors for major WMS/TMS; implementations advertised in as little as ~12 weeks.
- Ecosystem scale: Part of a platform used by hundreds of large enterprises across yards and marine terminals.
Cons
- Sales-led pricing: No clear public list pricing; third-party sites route to “get a quote.”
- Implementation lift: To unlock full value, most teams will tie into WMS/TMS and adjust workflows.
- Maybe more than basics: Feature-dense suite can be overkill for single-site, low-volume yards (fit consideration).
Best for
Multi-site shippers/3PLs with high trailer turns and complex networks—especially those wanting yard scheduling, real-time asset visibility, and tight integration with broader transportation/terminal systems.
C3 Solutions (C3 Yard & C3 Reservations)

C3 pairs a mature Yard Management System with a robust dock-appointment tool on one platform.
It emphasizes configurable rules (e.g., rule-based/AI durations), real-time visibility, and workflows that cut dwell and congestion while improving gate throughput and dock labor planning.
Pros
- Dual strength: Full YMS plus advanced dock scheduling in a single, cloud platform.
- Highly configurable: Rule-based durations and site-level constraints to match real operations.
- Proven at scale: Multi-site support and published case studies across industries.
Cons
- Pricing not public (sales-led; third-party listings route to “Get Price”).
- Setup/change management: Depth and configurability typically mean a heavier implementation than basic schedulers. (Inference from product scope.)
- Reporting UX feedback: Some users note that reporting feels clunky versus the rest of the system.
Best for
Multi-site shippers and 3PLs that want disciplined dock scheduling tightly coupled with a capable YMS—especially teams needing granular business rules, enterprise scale, and measurable reductions in detention/dwell.
Yard & Dock Management Software — Quick Comparison
Lightweight overview to scan across core focus, strengths, fit, and caveats.
| Platform | Primary Focus | Standout Features | Best For | Notable Cons |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenDock Dock Scheduling |
Carrier self-booking with centralized dock calendars, in/out tracking, and scorecards; API-friendly. | Carrier self-scheduling, detention/dwell tracking, carrier scorecards, quick setup, WMS/TMS/ERP APIs. | Warehouses/3PLs needing fast, straightforward appointment scheduling across one or many sites. | Primarily scheduling (limited advanced YMS); pricing typically quote-based per facility; carrier adoption may vary. |
| FourKites (Dynamic Yard) Yard + ETA Intelligence |
In-yard orchestration fused with real-time ETAs; AI-assisted scheduling and gate automation. | Inbound/Outbound Scheduler AI, YardWorks, AutoGate (computer vision), visual AI for gate/dock decisions. | Enterprises seeking predictive ETAs tied to dock calendars and measurable dwell/detention reduction. | Sales-led pricing; highest value when integrated with TMS/WMS—adds implementation effort. |
| GoRamp Dock Scheduling + Light YMS |
Time-slot management and dock scheduling with optional yard workflows and carrier self-service. | Self-scheduling portal, quick rollout, case studies showing improved predictability/control. | Ops teams wanting a modern, user-friendly scheduler with basic yard coordination. | Smaller ecosystem than legacy enterprise suites; advanced automation may require add-ons/integrations. |
| Kaleris (formerly PINC) Enterprise YMS |
Deep yard visibility and automation with dock, gate, and move orchestration; proven at scale. | RTLS via RFID/GPS for asset location, appointment scheduling, strong WMS/TMS/ERP integrations. | Multi-site shippers/3PLs with high trailer turns and complex networks needing real-time asset tracking. | Quote-based pricing; full value typically requires integrations and structured change management. |
| C3 Solutions (C3 Yard & C3 Reservations) YMS + Dock Scheduling |
Single platform for yard management and robust dock appointments with granular, rule-based durations. | Natural-language rules for appointment duration, cloud delivery, long track record and playbooks. | Teams prioritizing disciplined dock scheduling tightly coupled with yard planning/visibility. | Sales-led pricing; richer configuration can mean heavier setup vs. basic schedulers. |
Key Takeaways:
These reviews aren’t ranked—each platform fits different ops, and our goal is to give you enough context to make an informed decision for your sites.
And while great software streamlines scheduling and visibility, the right hardware keeps the flow safe and smooth day-to-day.
We can help you pair your chosen system with reliable hydraulic dock levelers, vehicle restraints, and industrial high-speed doors so crews move faster, equipment lasts longer, and yard congestion stays in check.





